Go Back To Where You Came From: Using Digital To Build Bridges

Posted: June 22, 2011 by Simon Fitzgerald in Digital, General, Peer Media, PR, Social Media, Social Stuff
Tags: , , , , , ,

Last night SBS aired, what it has been spruiking as a global television first, the reality doco Go Back To Where You Came From. A program that attempts to portray how the average Australian feels about refugees and ‘boat people’ and what the average Australian would experience if they were faced with a similar situation of having to escape their own country to seek asylum.

Unsurprisingly, the show was incredibly popular on social media channels, especially Twitter where at one stage it was the number one worldwide trending conversation. For me, the #GoBackSBS hashtag was updating too quickly to follow so I had to settle for conversing with those in my Twitter stream watching the show.

Its popularity, ratings (524K last night) and online discussion and engagement on Twitter will have SBS boss, Michael Ebeid feeling pretty chuffed this morning. It will also be interesting to see some of the social media stats from the show, such as number of tweets and keywords used in tweets, following the airing of the third and final episode on Thursday night…(watch this space).

Separately, I also mentioned on Twitter last night how I had stumbled upon an interesting campaign from NRMA which is currently using gaming as a medium to influence. NRMA’s Car Park Challenge game is a nice example of using digital tactics to engage consumers and educate them about what it considers a key issue, or PR play, beyond issuing a standard press release or hosting a media briefing. It’s certainly not a new idea, but it is a clever one. Plenty of organisations around the globe have executed similar tactics in the past, one example is Cisco with its binary game for students studying maths, science, IT, computing and programming. I would love to hear from NRMA about how this campaign goes.

So I wasn’t surprised when I logged onto the SBS Go Back To Where You Came From microsite this morning to see it too had created a simulation-type game to further enhance and amplify its message. By engaging its consumers online, the game, Asylum Exit Australia, is a great medium for SBS to use to establish a deeper connection between the audience and the brand, outside of the program’s 8:30pm-9:30pm television slots. In this case, the brand is the refugee experience and what it feels like to be put in unfathomable situations. The game’s players are allocated $9,990 AUD and are faced with making difficult decisions about leaving Australia, obtaining passports through the embassy or the black market, sourcing supplies, negotiating dangerous streets and leaving their loved ones to escape anarchy and instability.

Building a bridge and connection between the refugee experience and the Australian public is what SBS is attempting to do with Go Back To Where You Came From. Its PR and Marketing department appear to be doing this successfully by leveraging and integrating both traditional and online channels to connect to its audience and engage them in ways that simply weren’t possible 10 years ago (or even less). Something PR professionals should always consider as part of any communications campaign.

What are your thoughts?

Comments
  1. Rachel Vidaic says:

    Great read Simon! I think the other channel that leverages and integrates both traditional and online channels to connect and engage with the audience is ABC’s Q&A.

    I feel that SBS has always had the potential to initiate this kind of engagement and chatter amongst the Australian community because of its history and the role that it played in creating multicultural Australia. I’m very excited to continue watching ‘Go Back to Where you Came From’, but I’m more excited to continue following the conversations on Twitter and the SBS forum! What a success.

  2. simonfitzgerald says:

    Thanks Rachel. I agree, Q&A does a great job in creating another dimension for its audience to engage taking television from a one-way channel to a unilateral engagement.

  3. Tamara Jawad says:

    I wonder if the campaign reached the people it needed to reach.

  4. Adrianne says:

    Great post! Good to see SBS ‘gamifying’ through social media….

  5. Simon Clark says:

    I feel like my smartphone has become my new television remote. It’s a tool now to watch television with (or a live event) and engage on another level. I’ll be sitting on the couch using Twitter far more than the remote control. I always notice though how most of the tweets are often pretty droll and sometimes ignorant (eg qanda, logies or the royal wedding are good examples). It always brings me back to that old adage – opinions are like assholes, everyone’s got one. Well now everyone has the ability to share that with everyone around the world via social media.

  6. aval says:

    I find it particularly heartening to see a respected Australian institution willing to take a stance and innovative approach on such a politicised issue and get the focus back on the human element. I just hope it motivates those that believe in refugee rights to get active and is able to touch some of the cynics to help soften and change this national debate.

  7. anne says:

    Great piece Simon F. I didn’t watch the programme but have heard lots of commentary on it over the last few days. It really amazes me though what a top news angle this topic is. The number of refugees coming to australia is lower in 2011 than it wa a few years ago, yet its become such a hot topic. As a country of primarily made up of immigrants I find it bizarre that these people who’s grandparents or parents themselves may have feld their own countries are so anti these refugees coming here. What ever happened to a “fair go”?

  8. Trevor Long says:

    Spot on mate…

    Putting aside the absolute success of the social media engagement, doesn’t the ‘tweet stream’ issue show what a challenge lies ahead for Twitter – how can that ‘fast flowing stream’ during popular ‘events’ like this one be of ANY use when it can’t be read – a new level of filtering perhaps is required..

    An interesting example of that is
    http://hashtagbattle.com/battle/qanda/gobacksbs/w

    now this is showing a WEEK of tweets, and yes, GoBackSBS had three days while QandA had one, but its the data that I think is key. This site uses http://topsy.com/ to gather the stats, and it’s not a count of ALL tweets, it’s a count of credible tweets, ones that were re-tweeted or that contained links… A very interesting analytic.

    Anyway, I’m with you mate, a great effort by the PR team, and as one who is also part of the SBS team, I, like Michael am very proud to wear that badge this week, it’s been truly compelling TV…

    Catch you soon..

  9. simonfitzgerald says:

    Thanks for your insight Trevor and congratulations as well!

    I agree, very interesting points regarding fast flowing twitter streams and I think you may have sparked another blog post idea :)

  10. [...] note: This post originally appeared on the Text 100 Sydney Blog, Digital Comms Down Under. Comments 0 [...]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s